Animal Legal Defense Fund · Est. 2004

National AnimalLaw Competitions

The premier interscholastic competition in animal law — where the next generation of advocates argue, legislate, and define the future of animal protection.

Registration opening soon
Full details coming soon
📅
Hold the Date · 2026 Competition
The National Animal Law Competitions will be held October 15–17, 2026 in Washington, D.C. — marking a new chapter for the competition under ALDF leadership. Venue and registration details coming soon. View eligibility and past schedule →
20+
Years of Competition
3
Competition Events
D.C.
2026 Finals Location
60+
Law Schools Represented
About the Competition

A Two-Decade Tradition in
Animal Law Excellence

The NALC brings together law students, animal law scholars, and state and federal judges to work through the most demanding legal questions in animal protection — in real time, before real judges.

The National Animal Law Competitions were originally conceived in 2004 by Lewis & Clark Law School's Center for Animal Law Studies, with support from the Animal Legal Defense Fund and in collaboration with Harvard Law School. The competition was created by Laura Ireland, who went on to become associate director of Vermont Law's Animal Law and Policy Institute. From the first competition through 2016, Lewis & Clark led the organization and administration, establishing the NALC as the most prestigious student competition in the field.

At its peak, the NALC drew over 60 law students from 22 or more law schools across the country, competing in three distinct events: Appellate Moot Court, Closing Argument, and Legislative Drafting & Lobbying. The competition was unique in its scope — it addressed animal law not just as a litigation exercise, but as a policy and legislative challenge as well, anticipating the field's evolution toward movement lawyering.

After a hiatus from 2017 through 2022, the competition was revived in March 2023 under The Brooks Institute for Animal Rights Law and Policy, in partnership with Harvard, Lewis & Clark, Vermont Law, the University of Denver, the University of San Francisco, and Yale. The competition returned to its traditional home at Harvard Law School.

The Animal Legal Defense Fund now leads the NALC, bringing institutional depth, a national student chapter network, and direct connection to the frontlines of animal protection law. ALDF has been a founding partner of this competition since its inception and remains the primary professional organization supporting law students pursuing careers in animal law.

Why the NALC Matters
  • Develops trial and appellate advocacy skills in a rapidly growing legal field
  • Exposure to real federal and state court judges as competition evaluators
  • Unique legislative track tests policy drafting and lobbying — essential movement lawyering skills
  • Connects students with ALDF attorneys, scholars, and the broader animal law community
  • Problems drawn from real disputes — bridges theory and live practice
  • Open to all ABA-accredited law schools nationwide; no animal law program required
Institutional Partners
  • Animal Legal Defense FundLead Organizing Institution
  • Harvard Law SchoolFounding Partner · Animal Law & Policy Program
  • Lewis & Clark Law SchoolFounding Institution · Center for Animal Law Studies
  • Vermont Law & Graduate SchoolAnimal Law and Policy Institute
Competition History

From 2004 to Today

2004
Competition Founded
Lewis & Clark Law School establishes the NALC with ALDF support and Harvard collaboration. The competition was created by Laura Ireland (now associate director, VLGS Animal Law and Policy Institute). Three distinct events are established from the outset: Appellate Moot Court, Closing Argument, and Legislative Drafting & Lobbying.
2004–16
Thirteen Consecutive Competitions
Lewis & Clark runs the competition annually for thirteen years, building it into a nationally recognized event. At peak participation, over 60 law students representing more than 22 law schools compete. Lewis & Clark, John Marshall, Vermont Law, GWU, and other programs build storied traditions at the competition.
2017
Hiatus
The NALC goes on hiatus after its 2016 competition. The field continues to grow through the Animal Law Conference, ALDF student chapters, and expanding academic programs, but the national competition pauses for six years.
2023
Revival at Harvard
The Brooks Institute for Animal Rights Law and Policy relaunches the NALC in March 2023, with support from ALDF, Lewis & Clark, Harvard, Vermont Law, University of Denver, University of San Francisco, and Yale. Belmont University College of Law wins the Appellate Advocacy Competition. The competition returns home to Harvard Law School.
2024
Second Revival Year
Vermont Law & Graduate School wins the Appellate Advocacy Competition at the March 2024 competition at Harvard, with Drew McCormick and Taylor Rush earning 1st place, Best Brief, and Best Oral Advocate (Rush). The competition builds strong momentum in its second revival year.
Now
ALDF Takes the Lead
The Animal Legal Defense Fund assumes primary leadership of the National Animal Law Competitions, continuing the event at Harvard Law School. As the nation's leading animal protection legal organization, ALDF brings institutional continuity, a nationwide network of student chapters, and direct connection to the practicing bar.
The Events

Three Paths to
Championship

Each component tests a distinct legal skill set. Students may register for one event per year. All preliminary rounds are completed remotely; finals take place at Harvard Law School in March.

01
Appellate Advocacy Competition

Two-person teams argue both sides of a complex animal law case before panels of judges including sitting federal and state court jurists. Competitors submit written briefs in preliminary rounds; the top 8 teams advance to oral argument in Washington, D.C. Problems are authored by leading animal law practitioners and scholars.

Format Written brief + oral argument
Team Size 2 competitors per team
Finalists 8 teams advance to Washington, D.C.
Awards 1st, 2nd Place · Best Brief · Best Oral Advocate
02
Closing Argument Competition

Individual competitors deliver a closing argument in a simulated animal law case before a panel of judges. This event tests the ability to synthesize a factual record, construct a compelling narrative for the fact-finder, and perform under pressure — core skills for any trial attorney working in animal protection.

Format Oral performance
Team Size Individual entry
Finalists 10 individuals advance to Washington, D.C.
Awards 1st, 2nd Place · Best Oralist
03
Legislative Drafting & Lobbying

Competitors draft a model animal protection bill with an accompanying fact sheet, then lobby the legislation before a panel acting as hypothetical state legislators. This event tests policy drafting precision, legislative strategy, and real-world advocacy — skills that are essential to movement lawyering regardless of whether you litigate or legislate. Open to Masters students.

Format Written bill + lobbying argument
Team Size Individual entry
Finalists 10 individuals advance to Washington, D.C.
Awards 1st, 2nd Place · Best Bill & Fact Sheet
Competition Structure

How the Competition Works

8
Appellate Advocacy
Finalist Teams
10
Closing Argument
Finalists
10
Legislative Drafting
Finalists
Preliminary Rounds

All competitors begin with written and video oral advocacy submissions, evaluated remotely by expert graders. This allows students from any U.S. law school to compete regardless of proximity to Washington, D.C.

  • 1
    Registration Opens (Fall)
    Schools register competitors or teams through the ALDF portal. Registration typically opens in September.
  • 2
    Problems Released
    Competition problems — appellate records, closing argument scenarios, and legislative drafting topics — released to registered competitors after registration closes.
  • 3
    Written Submissions Due (January)
    Appellate briefs, bills with fact sheets, and closing argument materials are submitted remotely and reviewed by expert graders in animal law.
  • 4
    Finalists Notified (February)
    Top performers in each event are invited to participate in person at Harvard Law School in March.
Finals Weekend in Washington, D.C.

Finalists converge in Washington, D.C. for two days of live competition. The weekend includes competitor orientation, all final rounds, a Results Reception, and an Awards Ceremony. Venue to be announced.

  • Fri
    Competitor & Judges Orientation
    Competitor briefings 5:00–6:30pm. Coaches may attend. Judges' reception in the evening, connecting competitors with leading animal law practitioners and scholars.
  • Sat
    Preliminary Final Rounds + Results Reception
    All competition rounds 8:45am–4:35pm. Results Reception 5:00–7:00pm. Appellate semi-finals also held Saturday.
  • Sun
    Championship Finals & Awards Ceremony
    Final rounds 10:15am–2:30pm. Awards Ceremony at approximately 2:45pm. All rounds at the competition venue in Washington, D.C.
Judging

Evaluated by Real Judges

NALC panels are drawn from the federal and state judiciary and from leading animal law practitioners and scholars. Past panels have included U.S. Circuit Court and U.S. District Court judges.

Legal Analysis
Depth, accuracy, and creativity of legal argument — including the ability to anticipate counterarguments and weaknesses in the record.
Oral Advocacy
Command of the record, responsiveness to bench questions, persuasive delivery, and the ability to pivot under sustained judicial questioning.
Written Work Product
Organization, precision, citation quality, persuasive structure, and adherence to format requirements for briefs and legislative bills.
Policy Reasoning
(Legislative event) Soundness of policy rationale, realistic implementation strategy, balancing of competing interests, and performance under lobbying scrutiny.
Professionalism
Composure, courtroom and legislative chamber demeanor, and professional presentation consistent with expectations of practicing attorneys.
Animal Law Knowledge
Familiarity with relevant doctrine, statutes, and the evolving landscape of animal protection law — a differentiator at the highest levels of competition.
Hall of Champions

Historic Winners

A sourced record of competition excellence across more than twenty years. Where available, links to primary sources are provided for each entry.

A note on this archive: The NALC ran continuously from 2004 through 2016 (thirteen competitions), went on hiatus, and was revived in 2023. Complete winner records for several years — particularly 2004–2007 and 2010–2012 — are not fully documented in the public record. If your school has records of past finalists or winners, please contact ALDF to contribute to the historical archive. All entries below are sourced and linked.
Revival Era 2023 – Present
YearSchoolCompetitor(s)AwardsSource
2024 Vermont Law & Graduate School Drew McCormick & Taylor Rush Appellate Advocacy · 1st PlaceBest BriefBest Oral Advocate — Rush VLGS ↗
2024 Vermont Law & Graduate School Daria Bednarczyk Legislative Drafting · Finalist VLGS ↗
2023 Belmont University College of Law Madeline Gilmore & Alex SchramkowskiUndefeated through all elimination rounds Appellate Advocacy · 1st PlaceBest Oral Advocate — Schramkowski Belmont ↗
2023 Widener University Delaware Law School Natalie ZisaFirst-year student at time of competition Legislative Drafting · 1st Place ALDF ↗
Original Era 2004 – 2016
YearSchoolCompetitor(s)AwardsSource
201613th Annual Lewis & Clark Law School Appellate Moot Court · 1st PlaceAppellate Moot Court · 2nd PlaceBest BriefLegislative Drafting · 1st Place L&C ↗
201512th Annual Vermont Law School Scott Lake & Sophie Guilfoyle Appellate Moot Court · 1st PlaceBest Oralist — Guilfoyle VLS ↗
2015 Michigan State University College of Law Appellate Moot Court · 2nd Place VLS ↗
2015 Lewis & Clark Law School Legislative Drafting · 1st Place L&C ↗
2014 Lewis & Clark Law School Meg (class of 2014) Closing Argument · 1st PlaceBest Bill & Fact Sheet ALDF ↗
2014 Lewis & Clark Law School Appellate Moot Court · 2nd Place L&C ↗
2013 Lewis & Clark Law School Appellate Moot Court · 1st PlaceClosing Argument · 1st PlaceBest Bill & Fact Sheet L&C ↗
20107th Annual Lewis & Clark Law School Bryan Telegin & Mark Billingsley Appellate Moot Court · 2nd Place L&C ↗
2010 Lewis & Clark Law School Erin Walkowiak Closing Argument · 2nd Place L&C ↗
20096th Annual The John Marshall Law School Coach: Prof. Susann MacLachlan — first tie in competition history Closing Argument · 1st Place (Tied)Historic First Tie ALDF ↗
20085th Annual The John Marshall Law School Coach: Prof. Susann MacLachlan Closing Argument · 1st PlaceClosing Argument · 2nd Place ALDF ↗
20052nd Annual George Washington University Law School Moot Court · 1st PlaceBest Oralist GWU ↗
2004–12 Additional years partially or fully undocumented — submit records to ALDF →
Help complete this record. Many competition years are only partially documented in publicly available sources. If you or your institution have records of past finalists, winners, coaches, or problem authors — particularly for 2004–2012 — please contact the ALDF student programs team. We are actively building a comprehensive historical archive for the competition's 20+ year history.
Participate

Registration & Eligibility

Registration opens each fall. Preliminary rounds are completed remotely; finalists compete in person at Harvard Law School in March.

Competition Calendar

Key Dates

  • Fall — September
    Registration Opens
    All three competition tracks open for registration through the ALDF portal. Read competition rules before registering. Schools are encouraged to internally coordinate to avoid duplicate or conflicting registrations.
  • Fall — October / November
    Competition Problems Released
    Registered competitors receive competition problems — the appellate case record, closing argument scenario, and legislative drafting topic. Problems are authored by leading animal law practitioners and scholars.
  • Fall — November
    Registration Deadline
    Final deadline to register for all events. Late registrations are not accepted. Strongly recommended to read the full competition rules in advance.
  • Winter — January
    Preliminary Submissions Due
    Appellate briefs, closing argument materials, and legislative bills with fact sheets are submitted remotely. Video oral advocacy submissions may also be required. Reviewed by expert graders in animal law.
  • Winter — February
    Finalists Announced
    Top competitors in each event are notified and invited to the in-person finals in Washington, D.C. Schools are notified prior to public announcement.
  • Fall — October 15–17, 2026
    Finals Weekend in Washington, D.C.
    Two days of live competition in Washington, D.C. Includes competitor orientation, all preliminary and final rounds, a Results Reception, and the Awards Ceremony. Coaches may attend competitor briefings on the first evening. Venue to be announced.
Who Can Compete
  • Current JD candidates at any ABA-accredited U.S. law school
  • Masters students eligible for the Legislative Drafting & Lobbying event only
  • No prior animal law coursework required
  • Schools may enter multiple competitors across different events
  • Students may compete in only one event per year
  • Registration does not guarantee invitation to in-person finals

Registration is handled through the ALDF competition portal. For Appellate Advocacy teams, one member may register on behalf of both, but all competitor information must ultimately be provided.

Registration opens each September

Finals Venue
  • Washington, D.C. · October 15–17, 2026
    Venue to be announced
  • Lodging details and group rates provided to finalists upon selection
  • D.C. is served by three major airports: DCA, IAD, and BWI
Frequently Asked Questions

Registration FAQ

Can I compete if my school doesn't have an animal law program?
Yes. The NALC is open to any JD candidate at an ABA-accredited U.S. law school, regardless of whether your school has an animal law course, clinic, or student chapter. Many past finalists and winners competed as the only animal law student at their institution.
Can I compete in more than one event?
No. Students may register for and compete in only one event per competition year. Teams may not split across events as individual competitors.
Are there registration fees?
A nominal registration fee applies, payable by credit card through the competition portal. A small processing fee may apply. Contact [email protected] for current fee information.
Who writes the competition problems?
Problems are authored by leading animal law scholars and practitioners. Past problem authors have included Delcianna Winders, Lora Dunn, and Chris Green of ALDF. Problems address real and emerging legal issues in animal protection — cases and legislative scenarios that matter.
Can coaches attend the finals?
Yes. Coaches are welcome and may attend the competitor briefings on the first evening in D.C. Competition rounds themselves are judged independently — coaching does not occur during rounds.
Are Masters students eligible?
Masters students (including LLM candidates) are eligible to compete in the Legislative Drafting & Lobbying Competition only. They are not eligible for the Appellate Advocacy or Closing Argument events.
How are finalists selected?
Finalists are selected by a panel of judges reviewing all preliminary submissions. For Appellate Advocacy, 8 teams are selected. For Closing Argument and Legislative Drafting, 10 individuals are selected in each event. Judges assess written work product and, where applicable, video oral advocacy submissions.
What is the ALDF student chapter connection?
ALDF membership and student chapter membership are not required to compete. However, ALDF chapters at law schools across the country provide preparation support, networking, and community for competitors. Find your school's chapter at aldf.org.
Questions About the Competition?
Contact the ALDF Student Programs team at [email protected]
Contact ALDF