The premier interscholastic competition in animal law — where the next generation of advocates argue, legislate, and define the future of animal protection.
The NALC brings together law students, animal law scholars, and state and federal judges to work through the most demanding legal questions in animal protection — in real time, before real judges.
The National Animal Law Competitions were originally conceived in 2004 by Lewis & Clark Law School, with support from the Animal Legal Defense Fund and in collaboration with Harvard Law School. The competition was created by Laura Ireland, who went on to become associate director of Vermont Law & Graduate School's Animal Law and Policy Institute. From the first competition through 2016, Lewis & Clark led the organization and administration — first through its animal law faculty, and from 2008 onward through its newly established Center for Animal Law Studies (CALS) — building the NALC into the most prestigious student competition in the field.
At its peak, the NALC drew over 70 law students from nearly 30 law schools across the country, competing in three distinct events: Appellate Moot Court, Closing Argument, and Legislative Drafting & Lobbying. The competition was unique in its scope — it addressed animal law not just as a litigation exercise, but as a policy and legislative challenge as well, anticipating the field's evolution toward movement lawyering.
After a hiatus from 2017 through 2022, the competition was revived in March 2023 thanks to the generous support of The Brooks Institute for Animal Rights Law & Policy, which organized the 2023 and 2024 competitions in partnership with Harvard Law School, Lewis & Clark Law School, and Vermont Law & Graduate School. The competition returned to its traditional home at Harvard Law School for both years.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund now leads the NALC, bringing institutional depth, a national student chapter network, and direct connection to the frontlines of animal protection law. ALDF has been a partner in this competition since its inception — and its current Executive Director, Chris Green, won the closing argument competition at the inaugural 2004 event as a Harvard Law student.
Each component tests a distinct legal skill set. Students may register for one event per year. All preliminary rounds are completed remotely; finals take place in Washington, D.C.
Two-person teams argue both sides of a complex animal law case before panels of judges including sitting federal and state court jurists. Competitors submit written briefs in preliminary rounds; the top 8 teams advance to oral argument in Washington, D.C. Problems are authored by leading animal law practitioners and scholars.
Individual competitors deliver a closing argument in a simulated animal law case before a panel of judges. This event tests the ability to synthesize a factual record, construct a compelling narrative for the fact-finder, and perform under pressure — core skills for any trial attorney working in animal protection.
Competitors draft a model animal protection bill with an accompanying fact sheet, then lobby the legislation before a panel acting as hypothetical state legislators. This event tests policy drafting precision, legislative strategy, and real-world advocacy — skills that are essential to movement lawyering regardless of whether you litigate or legislate. Open to Masters students.
All competitors begin with written and video oral advocacy submissions, evaluated remotely by expert graders. This allows students from any U.S. law school to compete regardless of proximity to Washington, D.C.
Finalists converge in Washington, D.C. for two days of live competition. The weekend includes competitor orientation, all final rounds, a Results Reception, and an Awards Ceremony. Venue to be announced.
NALC panels are drawn from the federal and state judiciary and from leading animal law practitioners and scholars. Past panels have included U.S. Circuit Court and U.S. District Court judges.
A sourced record of competition excellence across more than twenty years. Where available, links to primary sources are provided for each entry.
| Year | School | Competitor(s) | Awards | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Vermont Law & Graduate School | Drew McCormick & Taylor Rush | Appellate Advocacy · 1st PlaceBest BriefBest Oral Advocate — Rush | VLGS ↗ |
| 2024 | Vermont Law & Graduate School | Daria Bednarczyk | Legislative Drafting · Finalist | VLGS ↗ |
| 2023 | Belmont University College of Law | Madeline Gilmore & Alex SchramkowskiUndefeated through all elimination rounds | Appellate Advocacy · 1st PlaceBest Oral Advocate — Schramkowski | Belmont ↗ |
| 2023 | Vermont Law & Graduate School | Kai Hardy & Morgan Zielinski | Appellate Advocacy · 2nd PlaceBest Brief | Brooks ↗ |
| 2023 | Lewis & Clark Law School | Nadia Pahodzina | Closing Argument · 1st PlaceBest Posttrial Motions/Appeals Memo | Brooks ↗ |
| 2023 | Widener University Delaware Law School | Natalie ZisaFirst-year student at time of competition | Legislative Drafting · 1st Place | ALDF ↗ |
| 2023 | University of Houston Law Center | Allie Soileau | Legislative Drafting · 2nd PlaceBest Legislative Bill | Brooks ↗ |
| Year | School | Competitor(s) | Awards | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201613th Annual | Lewis & Clark Law School | Gabe Hinman & Nathan Haynes | Appellate Moot Court · 1st PlaceBest Brief | L&C ↗ |
| 2016 | Lewis & Clark Law School | Brian Buske & Rachel Morris | Appellate Moot Court · 2nd Place | L&C ↗ |
| 201512th Annual | Vermont Law School | Scott Lake & Sophie Guilfoyle | Appellate Moot Court · 1st PlaceBest Oralist — Guilfoyle | VLS ↗ |
| 2015 | Michigan State University College of Law | Appellate Moot Court · 2nd Place | VLS ↗ | |
| 2015 | Lewis & Clark Law School | Legislative Drafting · 1st Place | L&C ↗ | |
| 2015 | WMU-Cooley Law School | Alicia PrygoskiNow ALDF Strategic Legislative Affairs Manager | Legislative Drafting · 2nd PlaceBest Bill & Fact Sheet | Cooley ↗ |
| 2014 | Lewis & Clark Law School | Meg (class of 2014) | Closing Argument · 1st PlaceBest Bill & Fact Sheet | ALDF ↗ |
| 2014 | Lewis & Clark Law School | Appellate Moot Court · 2nd Place | L&C ↗ | |
| 2013 | Lewis & Clark Law School | Appellate Moot Court · 1st PlaceClosing Argument · 1st PlaceBest Bill & Fact Sheet | L&C ↗ | |
| 20129th Annual | Lewis & Clark Law School | Andrew Erickson & Maggie HallHall: Best Oral Advocate & rare perfect score | Appellate Moot Court · 1st PlaceBest Oral Advocate — Hall | L&C ↗ |
| 2012 | University of Chicago Law School | Lily Becker & Alejandro Herrera | Appellate Moot Court · 2nd Place | L&C ↗ |
| 2012 | Yale Law School | Nick Arrivo & Lewis BollardBollard now leads Open Philanthropy Farm Animal Welfare | Best Brief | L&C ↗ |
| 2012 | Lewis & Clark Law School | Jaclyn Leeds | Closing Argument · 1st Place | L&C ↗ |
| 2012 | University of Chicago Law School | Molly Wiltshire | Closing Argument · 2nd Place | L&C ↗ |
| 2012 | Drexel University Earle Mack School of Law | Shari Kulanu | Legislative Drafting · 1st PlaceBest Bill & Fact Sheet | L&C ↗ |
| 20118th Annual | Lewis & Clark Law School | Meredith Price | Closing Argument · 1st Place | L&C ↗ |
| 2011 | George Washington University Law School | Andrew Friedman | Closing Argument · 2nd Place | L&C ↗ |
| 2011 | George Washington University Law School | Katelin Shugart-Schmidt | Legislative Drafting · 1st Place | L&C ↗ |
| 2011 | Harvard Law School | Myra Blake & Alex Krueger | Best Brief | L&C ↗ |
| 2011 | Florida A&M / University of New Mexico | Farheen Jahangir & Cristella Valdez | Best Oral Advocate — Tied | L&C ↗ |
| 20107th Annual | Lewis & Clark Law School | Bryan Telegin & Mark Billingsley | Appellate Moot Court · 2nd Place | L&C ↗ |
| 2010 | Lewis & Clark Law School | Erin Walkowiak | Closing Argument · 2nd Place | L&C ↗ |
| 20096th Annual | The John Marshall Law School | Coach: Prof. Susann MacLachlan — first tie in competition history | Closing Argument · 1st Place (Tied)Historic First Tie | ALDF ↗ |
| 20085th Annual | The John Marshall Law School | Coach: Prof. Susann MacLachlan | Closing Argument · 1st PlaceClosing Argument · 2nd Place | ALDF ↗ |
| 20052nd Annual | George Washington University Law School | Moot Court · 1st PlaceBest Oralist | GWU ↗ | |
| 2004Inaugural | Harvard Law School | Chris GreenNow ALDF Executive Director | Closing Argument · 1st Place | L&C ↗ |
| 2004–12 | Additional years partially or fully undocumented — submit records to ALDF → | |||
Registration opens each fall. Preliminary rounds are completed remotely; finalists compete in person in Washington, D.C.
Registration is handled through the ALDF competition portal. For Appellate Advocacy teams, one member may register on behalf of both, but all competitor information must ultimately be provided.
Registration opens each May